Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:30

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Asian Shares Have Tepid Start Before US Jobs Data: Markets Wrap - Bloomberg
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
‘Hamilton’ Original Cast Reunites for Tony Awards Medley — Watch - The Hollywood Reporter
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Scoop: Every Senate Dem demands Trump withdraw military from Los Angeles - Axios
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
🌿🌻Why are Meghan and Harry not treated like royalty in the United States anymore?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What bait should you use for ocean fishing?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Do you suck dicks with no reciprocation?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?